A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ENHANCING LOGICAL AND COMMUNICATIVE THINKING IN FUTURE SPECIALISTS THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
Ключевые слова:
Keywords: digital education, logical thinking, communicative competence, future specialists, educational technology, interactive learning, digital pedagogy, cognitive development, higher education reformАннотация
Abstract. This article presents a comprehensive methodological approach to enhancing logical and communicative thinking in future specialists through the integration of digital technologies in higher education. In the context of evolving educational demands, the study underscores the importance of cognitive flexibility and communication skills in the professional readiness of university graduates. Using both theoretical analysis and empirical methods, the study implemented a pilot program involving 120 students across various disciplines. The findings revealed significant improvements in students' reasoning and communicative abilities, highlighting the effectiveness of digital tools such as debate platforms, collaborative workspaces, and logic-based applications. The article concludes that structured digital pedagogy can greatly enrich students' cognitive and social competencies, making them more adaptable to the challenges of the digital era. It also outlines implementation challenges and provides recommendations for sustainable integration in educational institutions.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longman.
3. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
4. Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Modeling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change. Pearson Education.
5. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Longman.
6. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning.
7. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge.
8. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Wiley.
9. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record.
10. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
