STANDARDIZATION OF OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE IN PREVENTING POST - CESAREAN LOW BACK PAIN
Keywords:
Keywords: Cesarean section, low back pain, postpartum complications, obstetrical standardization, spinal anesthesia, maternal health, clinical guidelinesAbstract
Abstract. Post-cesarean low back pain is a common but often underestimated complication affecting women's quality of life during the postpartum period. Variations in obstetrical practices, including spinal anesthesia techniques, patient positioning, and perioperative care, significantly contribute to the development of this condition. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of standardizing obstetrical protocols to prevent low back pain after cesarean delivery. Through a comprehensive review of clinical studies and practical implementation of unified guidelines in selected maternity centers, the study demonstrates that adherence to standardized protocols leads to a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of post-cesarean low back pain. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary coordination among obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and rehabilitation specialists to enhance maternal outcomes and long-term well-being.
References
1. Abdullaeva DR Standard approach based on cesarean section from cutting then the pain reduce efficiency // In medicine Innovations . – 2023. – No. 4. – P. 56–61.
2. Smith J., Brown A. Enhanced recovery protocols in cesarean delivery: A systematic review // Int J Obstet Anesth . - 2022. - Vol. 50. – P. 85–91.
3. Omonova Z. Sh. Kesarva from practice then pain syndrome : assessment and prevent to take Pathways // Obstetrics and Gynecology . – 2021. – No. 3. – P. 43–49.
4. Wilson R. et al. Comparison of standard vs. enhanced recovery after cesarean section: a randomized trial // Am J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 226(5). – P. 487.e1–487.e8.
5. Akhmedova MX Painless to give birth approach : obstetrics modern standards // Scientific and practical obstetrics Journal . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 27–32.
6. Johnson T., Lee H. Pain management and maternal outcomes after cesarean section: a review of ERAC protocols // Obstet Anesth Rev. - 2021. - Vol. 45. – P. 201–209.
7. Rasulova GB Kesarvadan next rehabilitation: early mobilization and physiotherapy role // Uzbek Medicine Journal . – 2022. – No. 6. – P. 88–93.
8. Thompson K. et al. Standardizing cesarean section techniques to minimize postoperative pain // J Obstet Surg. - 2020. - Vol. 39(2). – P. 102–109.
9. Nuriddinova N. Kesarva from cutting then the pain VAS in assessment and subjective of the criteria application // Andijan medicine Journal . – 2023. – No. 1. – P. 59–65.
10. Patel S., Morgan J. Post-cesarean pain and recovery: optimizing outcomes through evidence-based practices // J Perinat Med. - 2021. - Vol. 49(3). – P. 345–352.
11. Abdurakhmonova ZI Obstetrics in operations rehabilitation standardization clinical advantages // Medical in practice news . – 2022. – No. 5. – P. 11–18.
12. Liu Y., Chen Q. Regional anesthesia and cesarean delivery: implications for postoperative pain // Chin J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 58(7). – P. 672–678.
13. Akhmedov TR Kesarva according to clinical recommendations and their pain syndrome impact // Tashkent medicine academy Newsletter . – 2021. – No. 4. – P. 39–44.
14. Garcia M. et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery: effects on length of stay and pain management // Birth. - 2023. - Vol. 50(1). – P. 47–54.
15. Tursunova DK Kesarvadan next complications prevent in receiving protocoled approaches // Scientific research . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 14–20.
