EXTRALINGUISTIC ISSUES IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: WORLDVIEWS, CUSTOMS, NONVERBAL LANGUAGE AND THE ROLE OF SOCIETY

Authors

  • Ibodullayev Romil Author
  • Shamurodova Naima Muxtarovna Author

Keywords:

Key words: Intercultural communication; extralinguistic factors; worldview; customs; nonverbal communication; body language; society; cultural competence.

Abstract

This article examines the extra linguistic dimensions of intercultural communication with a particular focus on worldview, customs, non verbal language,  and the role of society. While linguistic proficiency is vital in cross-cultural contexts, effective communication also requires a deep understanding of cultural practices that extend beyond language. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from anthropology, sociology, and communication studies, the paper analyzes how different worldviews shape perception, how rituals and traditions reinforce identity, how customs and social norms regulate behavior, and how nonverbal communication conveys meaning across cultural boundaries. The discussion also highlights the influence of societal institutions in shaping communicative norms. Practical implications are explored in relation to education, diplomacy, and business, emphasizing the importance of cultural competence in today’s globalized world. The study concludes that intercultural effectiveness depends not only on linguistic ability but also on sensitivity to the symbolic, behavioral, and social dimensions of culture.

References

1. Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Sage. p23-30.

2. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge p30-20.

3. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2).

4. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books. p128-129.

5. Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (4th ed.). Routledge. p67-68.

6. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor p88-89.

7. Hall, E. T. (1983).The dance of life:The other dimension of time. Anchor.p98-99.

8. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage. p67-68.

9. Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Chandler & Sharp. p54-55.

10. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt.p80-81.

11. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Wadsworth.p56-57.

12. Nakane, I. (2007).Silence in intercultural communication. John Benjamins.p8-9.

13. Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. Free Press. p89-90.

14. Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2012). Intercultural communication: A reader (13th ed.). Cengage.p78-79.

15. Shamuradova N. (2021). Comparative Study of English and Uzbek Proverbs Usage of parts of body. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСКУССТВО СЛОВА.

16. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview. p73-74

17. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine. p134-135.

Published

2025-11-02

How to Cite

Ibodullayev Romil, & Shamurodova Naima Muxtarovna. (2025). EXTRALINGUISTIC ISSUES IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: WORLDVIEWS, CUSTOMS, NONVERBAL LANGUAGE AND THE ROLE OF SOCIETY. Ta’limda Raqamli Texnologiyalarni Tadbiq Etishning Zamonaviy Tendensiyalari Va Rivojlanish Omillari, 48(3), 277-281. https://scientific-jl.com/trt/article/view/27939