DEVELOPMENT OF LAPAROSCOPIC OPERATIONS IN URGENT SURGERY.
Keywords:
Despite the wide range of non-invasive research methods, diagnostics of acute surgical diseases of the abdominal organs in some cases is very difficult. In this situation, the use of laparoscopy allows for timely diagnosis and determination of surgical tacticsAbstract
As part of general scientific and technical progress, the constant introduction of new technologies makes them an integral part of a particular field of medicine. A modern trend in the development of surgery is to reduce the invasiveness and trauma of surgical interventions. In connection with the development of surgical technologies, one of the main tasks in surgery is to minimize surgical trauma and the subsequent reduction in the number of postoperative complications and mortality, as well as the duration of inpatient treatment of patients while maintaining the quality of surgical care. This goal in abdominal surgery canbe achieved with the wide and
widespread introduction of endosurgical technologies into everyday practice.
References
1.
Agresta F. Peritonitis: Laparoscopic approach / Agresta F. et al. // W J of Emerg
Surg. - 2006. - № 1. - P. 9.
2.
Antonio S.A. Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Perforated
Peptic Ulcer / S.A. Antoniou // JSLS. - 2013. - Vol. 17. - P. 15-22.
3.
Balen E. The role of laparoscopy in emergency abdominal surgery / E. Balen
[et al.] // An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. - 2005. - № 3 - P. 81-92.
4.
Bittner R. The Standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy / R. Bittner //
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. - 2004. - т. 389. №3. - с. 157-163
5.
Bucher, P. Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy / P. Bucher F.
Pugin, N. Buchs [et al.] // World J. Surg. — 2009. — № 33. — P. 1015-1019.
6.
Brokelman W.J. Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery / W.J.
Brokelman [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. - 2011. - Vol. 25, № 1. - P. 1-9.
7.
Bucher P. Transumbiblcal single-port laparoscopic repair of perforated
gasrtoduodenal ulcer / P. Bucher [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 24, № 1. - P.
82.283
8.
Corcione F., Cuccurullo D., Pirozzi F., et al. The Role of Laparoscopy in
Emergency Treatment of Complications after Laparoscopic and Endoscopic
Procedures // The Role of Laparoscopy in Emergency Abdominal Surgery / ed. V.
Mandala. – Italia: Springer-Verlag, 2012. – P. 175–189. – (Updates in Surgery).
9.
Chow, A. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an
evolving technique / A. Chow, S. Purkayastha, O. Aziz, P. Paraskeva // Surg. Endosc.
— 2010. — № 24 (3). — P. 709 -714.10. Keus F, et al. Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small
incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave
outweighs
efforts
in
hospital
savings;
http://www.trialsjoumal.eom/content/10/l/80
11.
2009.
Available
from:
Miyano G., Okazaki T., Kato Y. et al. Open versus laparoscopic treatment for
pan-peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective analysis
// J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2010. Vol. 20, № 7. P. 655–657.
12. Pucher PH, Carter NC, Knight BC, Toh S, Tucker V, Mercer SJ. Impact of
laparoscopic approach in emergency major abdominal surgery: single-centre analysis
of
748 consecutive cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(4):279-284.
https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0229
13.
Shamiyeh A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and
their treatment /A. Shamiyeh, W. Wayand// Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. - 2004. - t. 389. №3. - p. 164-171
14. Thawait A, Dwivedi S, Bhatt M, Bakhshish K, Mittal A. Role of early
laparoscopy in diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4:1568
1574.
15.
Vilallonga R. Reply to safety of veress needle insertion in laparoscopic bariatric
surgery / R. Vilallonga, J. Himpens // Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and
Percutaneous Techniques. - 2014. т. 24. №3. - с. 283
