BOOSTING STUDENT INVOLVEMENT WITH ACTIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
##semicolon##
active learning, student engagement, higher education, teaching methods, collaborative learning, student performance.##article.abstract##
This article examines the influence of active learning strategies on academic performance and student engagement. This article employed a methodology that integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to inestigate the effects
of active learning in greater detail. The findings suggest a significant increase in student engagement and motivation, as well as an improvement in academic performance and participation in class activities. The essential information underscores that students
appreciate the interactive nature of effective teaching methods, such as collaborative projects and group discussions, despite the presence of certain challenges associated with the transition from passive to active learning and time management. This study
examines the advantages of active learning and offers potential solutions to the challenges that educators may encounter when attempting to implement these \techniques in the classroom.
##submission.citations##
1. Freeman, S., O’Connor, K. M., Parks, J. M., Cunningham, M. H., & Dirks,C. (2014).
The impact of active learning on student performance: A meta-analysis. CSE Reports,
10(5), 1-20.
2. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research.Journal of
Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
3. Abulkosimovna, E.Z. (2022) ‘Synonymous analysis of professional words in
English and Uzbek’, Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 02(05), pp. 15
22. doi:10.37547/socialfsshj-02-05-03.
4. Mamatkulova, F., Azamov, A., & Eshquvvatov, B. (2024). The features in foreign
languages and learning processes. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti
konferensiyalari, 130-134.
5. Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Ta’lim va ta’limda
ta’lim texnologiyalari. Ko‘p tillilik muhitida xorijiy tillarni rivojlantirishning
innovatsion
va
integrativ
muammolari,
1(01),
207
213.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11255760.
6. Rashidova, G., & Khilola, K. (2024). THE ROLE OF INTONATION AND STRESS
IN MEANING. TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA.
INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR, 1(3), 72-75.7. Abdramanov, S., Muratbaev, N., Joldasova, A., & Sultanova, M. (2025). GENERAL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING.
Modern Science and Research, 4(4), 625-629.
8. Abulkosimovna, E. Z. (2022). Synonymous analysis of professional words in
English and Uzbek. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 2(05), 15-22.
9. Gulomova, R. (2020). Sociolinguistic competence of L2 students. TJE- Tematics
journal of Education ISSN, 2249-9822.
10. Alimdjanovna, K. M. (2024). ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN
TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences,
Philosophy and Culture, 4(5-1), 163-166.
11. Kholbutayeva, S., & Gulshoda, R. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS:
HOW TO ENHANCE STUDENT ENGAGEMENTTHROUGH KAHOOT?. YANGI
O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 2(7), 141-145.
12. Koppelman, P., & Gulomova, R. (2024). Amerika ingliz tilidagi leksik
o'zgarishlarning madaniyatlararo muloqotga ta'siri. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahontillari
universiteti konferensiyalari, 619-624.
13. Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Educational
technologies in teaching and learning. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti
konferensiyalari, 207-213.
