COMMONALITIES AND VARIATIONS IN THE SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL USE OF FLORA IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK DESCRIPTIONS

Authors

  • Ibrohimova Nasiba Mirzohid qizi Author

Keywords:

Keywords: flora, metaphor, semantics, structural analysis, English language, Uzbek language

Abstract

ANNOTATION 
This article analyzes the semantic and structural usage of flora-related terms in 
English and Uzbek. It highlights the similarities and differences in expressing human 
characteristics, emotions, and values through plant imagery. The comparative  study 
also explores metaphorical usage and grammatical structures in both languages.  

References

REFERENCES

1. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.

2. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago

Press.

3. Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words.

Oxford University Press.

4. Central Asian Survey. (2015). Various articles on Uzbek culture and language

symbolism.

5. Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language.

Cambridge University Press.

6. Karimov R (2020). “The role of chinor in uzbek cultural heritage”.Samarkand

Academic Journal, 12(3),45-58

7. Czarniawska, B. (2005). Metaphor in Organizational Research. Edward Elgar

Publishing.p74

Downloads

Published

2025-05-22

Issue

Vol. 62 No. 6 (2025): TADQIQOTLAR jahon ilmiy-metodik jurnali | 62-son | 6-qism

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ibrohimova Nasiba Mirzohid qizi. (2025). COMMONALITIES AND VARIATIONS IN THE SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL USE OF FLORA IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK DESCRIPTIONS . TADQIQOTLAR, 62(6), 151-155. https://scientific-jl.com/tad/article/view/15415