ATROF-MUHITGA YETKAZILGAN ZARARNI BAHOLASH VA KOMPENSATSIYA QILISH: XALQARO HUQUQIY ASOSLAR VA MUAMMOLAR
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: atrof-muhit zararini baholash, ekologik kompensatsiya, transchegaraviy zarar, xalqaro atrof-muhit huquqi, davlatlar javobgarligi va “ifloslantiruvchi to‘laydi” prinsipi.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada atrof-muhitga yetkazilgan zararni baholash va kompensatsiya
qilishning xalqaro huquqiy asoslari hamda ushbu sohadagi asosiy muammolar tahlil
qilinadi. Tadqiqotda atrof-muhitga yetkazilgan ekologik zararning turli shakllari,
ularni baholash metodologiyasi va kompensatsiya mexanizmlarining hozirgi holati
ko‘rib chiqilgan. Xalqaro sud amaliyoti tahlili asosida zamonaviy xalqaro huquqda
mavjud bo‘lgan kamchiliklar va ularni bartaraf etishning mumkin bo‘lgan yo‘llari
aniqlangan. Maqolada davlatlarning atrof-muhit sohasidagi javobgarligi,
“ifloslantiruvchi to‘laydi” prinsipi va kompensatsiya fondlarining ahamiyati alohida
ta’kidlangan.
References
1. X.M.Yunusov. Atrof-muhitga transchegaraviy ta’sir orqali yetkazilgan zarar uchun
xalqaro-huquqiy javobgarlik. Xalqaro munosabatlar fanlararo ilmiy-nazariy
jurnal.- 3-4 /2020. № 81-82.
2. Birnie P., Boyle A., Redgwell C. International Law and the Environment. 3rd ed.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 89.
3. Sands P. Principles of International Environmental Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 156.
4. Brown Weiss E. International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the
Emergence of a New World Order // Georgetown Law Journal. 1993. Vol. 81. P.
675-710.
5. ILC Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous
Activities. UN Doc. A/56/10, 2001.
6. Jonas H. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the
Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. P. 142.
7. Boyd J. The Nonmarket Benefits of Nature: What Should be Counted in Green
GDP? // Ecological Economics. 2007. Vol. 61. P. 716-723.
8. Stewart R.B. Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Opportunities and
Obstacles // Environmental Law and Policy: Nature, Law, and Society. 4th ed. 2010.
P. 234.
9. OECD Recommendation on Guiding Principles concerning International Economic
Aspects of Environmental Policies. C(72)128, 1972.
10. Prieur M. Droit de l'environnement. 6ème éd. Paris: Dalloz, 2011. P. 167.
11. Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement, 1991. Can. T.S. 1991 No. 3.
12. Swaigen J. Transboundary Environmental Cooperation // Canadian Environmental
Law. 2nd ed. Toronto: Butterworths, 1993. P. 445.
13. International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for
Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1971. 1110 UNTS 57.
14. Handl G. Chernobyl: Radiological Consequences for Third States // Environmental
Policy and Law. 1988. Vol. 18. P. 50-55.
15. Sand P.H. Compensation for Environmental Damage from the 1986 Chernobyl
Nuclear Accident // Environmental Policy and Law. 2005. Vol. 35. P. 123-128.
16. Umwelthaftungsgesetz (Environmental Liability Act), Germany, 1990. BGBl. I S.
2634.
17. https://www.undp.org/ukraine/projects/environmental-damage-assessment
18. https://ijc.org/en/mission/air-quality-
agreement#:~:text=Signed%20in%201991%2C%20The%20Canada,every%20two
%20years%20on%20progress.
