DIFFERNCES BETWEEN ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND OTHER RADIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS

Authors

  • Fayzullayeva M.B Author
  • Sayfiddin Hoji Qadriddin Author

Keywords:

Key words: ultrasonography, tomosynthesis, diagnosis, mammography

Abstract

 
Summary: 
Annotation.  Recent  guidelines  recommend  the  prioritized  use  of 
ultrasonography as the main imaging method for women under the age of 45, with 
mammography being considered when additional imaging is deemed necessary.  

References

References

1. Willett AM, Michell MJ, Lee MJ. Best Practice Diagnostic Guidelines for Patients

Presenting with Breast Symptoms. London: DH; 2010. p15.

2. Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM et al Sydney breast imaging accuracy study:

comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young

women with symptoms. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 180: 935–940.

3. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening

mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that

influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2012; 225:

165–175. 4. Osako T, Iwase T, Takahashi K et al Diagnostic mammography and

ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to

39 years. Breast Cancer 2017; 14: 255–259.

5. Devolli-Disha E, Manxhuka-Kërliu S, Ymeri H, Kutllovci A. Comparative

accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms

according to age and breast density. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2009; 9: 131–136.

6. Royal College of Radiologists. Guidance on Screening and Symptomatic Breast

Imaging. 2nd edn. London: RCR; 2013.

7. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts:

detection with screening US – diagnostic yield and tumor

characteristics. Radiology 2018; 207: 191–199.

8. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al Incidental findings on

sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Am J

Roentgenol 1999; 173: 921–927.

9. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women

with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2011; 221: 641–649.

10. Yankaskas BC, Haneuse S, Kapp JM et al Performance of first mammography

examination in women younger than 40 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 102: 692–

701.

11. Maxwell AJ, Ridley NT, Rubin G et al The Royal College of Radiologists Breast

Group breast imaging classification. Clin Radiol 2019; 64: 624–627.

12. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL et al Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to

distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 2015; 196: 123–134.

13. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Royal College of Pathologists. Pathology

Reporting of Breast Disease. London: RCPath; 2015.

14. Royal College of Pathologists. Tissue Pathways for Breast Pathology. London:

RCPath; 2019.

15. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al Screening with magnetic resonance

imaging and mammography in a UK population at high familial risk of breast

cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2015; 365:

1,769–1,778.

Published

2025-04-06

How to Cite

Fayzullayeva M.B, & Sayfiddin Hoji Qadriddin. (2025). DIFFERNCES BETWEEN ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND OTHER RADIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS . TADQIQOTLAR, 59(3), 229-238. https://scientific-jl.com/tad/article/view/7849