DEVELOPING INDEPENDENT LEARNING IN PHYSICS EDUCATION BASED ON THE STEM APPROACH
Abstract
The integration of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education has become a pivotal approach in modernizing teaching methodologies, particularly in physics education. This paper investigates how the STEM approach can effectively foster independent learning skills among physics students in technical higher education institutions. Independent learning is a crucial competency that empowers students to take ownership of their educational journey, develop critical thinking, and solve complex problems autonomously. By embedding STEM principles into physics curricula, educators can promote active engagement, deeper conceptual understanding, and practical application of theoretical knowledge.
The study analyzes various pedagogical strategies, including problem-based learning, inquiry-based activities, and the use of interactive digital tools such as simulations and virtual laboratories. These methods encourage students to explore, experiment, and reflect on physical phenomena without constant instructor supervision, thereby enhancing their self-regulation and motivation. Furthermore, the research reviews case studies and practical implementations from technical universities that demonstrate positive outcomes in student performance and independent study habits.
References
1. Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
2. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
3. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
4. de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579
5. Perkins, K. K., Wieman, C., & Adams, W. K. (2006). PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
6. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
