THE EFFICACY OF PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY (PGT-A) IN IMPROVING CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATES
Abstract
Abstract. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become
an integral part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) aimed at improving
clinical pregnancy rates by selecting genetically viable embryos for transfer. Among
the most common methods of PGT-A are fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and
next-generation sequencing (NGS), each with distinct advantages and limitations. This
thesis investigates and compares the clinical outcomes of these methods, particularly
focusing on clinical pregnancy rates and the proportion of euploid embryos, in women
of varying reproductive age. Recent studies have shown that while both methods serve
to increase clinical pregnancy rates, NGS/SNP has demonstrated superior efficacy in
identifying a wider array of chromosomal abnormalities, leading to better outcomes,
particularly for women of advanced maternal age. The ability of NGS/SNP to detect a
broader spectrum of chromosomal issues, including microdeletions and translocations,
makes it more accurate in selecting genetically healthy embryos for transfer. In
contrast, FISH, despite its advantages in detecting certain chromosomal abnormalities,
has a narrower range of detection, often missing more complex aneuploidies, especially
in older women. In clinical studies, NGS/SNP has been shown to result in higher
clinical pregnancy rates compared to FISH. For instance, a study by Munné et al.
(2018) demonstrated that NGS/SNP improved clinical outcomes significantly for
women over 35 years, achieving a pregnancy rate of 66.67% compared to 40% with
FISH (Munné et al., 2018). Furthermore, NGS/SNP's higher sensitivity enables more
accurate identification of euploid embryos, which is crucial for improving pregnancy
success rates. Although NGS/SNP is more expensive and requires a longer processing
time compared to FISH, its ability to detect a broader range of chromosomal
abnormalities offers a more reliable and comprehensive approach to embryo selection.
As a result, NGS/SNP is increasingly becoming the method of choice in ART,
particularly for women with advanced maternal age who face a higher risk of
chromosomal abnormalities and miscarriage.
References
References:
1. Munné S, Magli C, Grifo J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves
ART outcomes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):56
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29863695/)
2. Rechitsky S, Lavy Y, Tsai N. Comparative efficacy of PGT-A techniques in women
of advanced maternal age. J Reprod Med. 2021;66(3):210-216.
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33767934/)
3. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization and
NGS for preimplantation genetic screening: Implications for clinical practice. Fertil
Steril. 2017;107(6):1450-1457. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28277975/)
4. McCulloch CE, Wells D. Advancements in genomic testing for ART: NGS and
beyond. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(5):954-962.
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32155616/)
5. Harper J, McVeigh E, Schutte J, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of NGS in PGT-A. Hum
Reprod. 2020;35(3):586-593.(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32099316/)