HOW POLITICAL LEADERS SOFTEN REALITY THROUGH EUPHEMISMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
Keywords:
Key words: Euphemisms, political discourse, English, Uzbek, language manipulation, softening reality, political communication, linguistic strategies, public perception, critical language awareness.Abstract
Abstract. Language plays a powerful role in shaping public perception,
especially in the realm of politics where words are carefully chosen to influence,
persuade, and often soften difficult realities. One common linguistic strategy employed
by political leaders is the use of euphemisms indirect or mild expressions used in place
of harsher or more direct language. Euphemisms serve as tools for managing public
reaction, masking unpleasant truths, and framing political actions in a more favorable
light. In both English and Uzbek political discourse, euphemistic expressions are
frequently used to discuss sensitive topics such as war, economic downturns,
corruption, and social unrest.
This article explores how political leaders in English- and Uzbek-speaking
contexts utilize euphemisms to reshape public understanding and mitigate negative
responses. It investigates the linguistic forms, functions, and cultural nuances of
political euphemisms in both languages. By comparing examples from speeches,
official statements, and media coverage, the study aims to uncover patterns in how
reality is linguistically softened and how these strategies reflect broader cultural and
political practices. Understanding this phenomenon is essential for developing critical
language awareness and recognizing the persuasive mechanisms embedded in political
communication.
References
1. Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as
Shield and Weapon. Oxford University Press, 1991.
2. Bhatia, Vijay K. “Political Discourse.” In Language and Power, edited by Paul
Simpson and Andrea Mayr, Routledge, 2010, pp. 10–32.
3. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. “Euphemism and Political Discourse in the British
Regional Press.” Journal of Language and Politics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2014, pp. 213–
234.
4. Lakoff, George. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. University
of Chicago Press, 2002.
5. Lutz, William. The New Doublespeak: Why No One Knows What Anyone's Saying
Anymore. HarperCollins, 1996.
6. Rakhmatullaeva, Malika. “The Role of Euphemisms in Uzbek Political Speeches.”
Uzbek Linguistics Journal, no. 2, 2020, pp. 64–71.
