COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTER-TEXT MARKERS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK MEDIA SPEECH

Authors

  • Laylo Salimova Author

Keywords:

Keywords: English, texts, comparative analysis, relationships, markers, pragmatic tools, sentence, paragraphs.

Abstract

Abstract: Intertextual markers are of great importance in linguistics as tools that 
ensure the logical connection of a text. They link thoughts, sentences, and paragraphs 
within the text to make it easier for the reader or listener to understand information. In 
English, intertextual markers are divided into different categories, each with its own 
function and method of use. In Uzbek, however, intertextual connection is achieved 
through more syntactic and pragmatic means, which, when compared with markers in 
English, shows the peculiarities of the language. 

References

References:

1. Abdullaeva, M. (2022). Intertextuality and intertextuality: a comparison in English

and Uzbek. Journal” linguistics and culture", No. 5.

2. Karimov, S. (2023). The role of inter-text markers in Media speech and their

expression in Uzbek. Academic journal” Uzbek language and literature", No. 12.

3. Islamov, D. (2021). Intertextual markers in English and their translation into Uzbek:

problems and solutions. Collection” language and Communication", No. 8.

4. Nazarova, F. (2020). Pragmatic aspects of logical connection in Uzbek media

discourse. Scientific journal "Information and language", No. 3.

5. Tursunov, A. (2024). Intertextual markers and their place in Uzbek: a comparative

analysis. Collection” philology and culture", No. 7.

6. Rachmonova, G. (2022). Specifics of inter-text link tools in English and Uzbek.

Scientific journal "linguistics News", No. 9.

7. Saidova, N. (2023). Markers that provide a logical connection in Media speech: a

comparison of English and Uzbek. Scientific journal” Journalism and

Communication", No. 4.

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

Laylo Salimova. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTER-TEXT MARKERS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK MEDIA SPEECH . Ta’lim Innovatsiyasi Va Integratsiyasi, 46(3), 239-241. https://scientific-jl.com/tal/article/view/18559